Novel Peptide–Doxorubucin Conjugates for Targeting Breast Cancer Cells Including the Multidrug Resistant Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The efficacy of chemotherapeutic doxorubucin (Dox) in cancer treatment is limited by two main factors, nonspecific toxicity and the emergence of tumor resistance. To overcome these hurdles, in this study peptide-Dox conjugates were prepared. A decapeptide 18-4a (NH₂-WxEAAYQkFL-CONH₂) [corrected] with high specificity for breast cancer cells and improved proteolytic stability was conjugated to Dox to give peptide-Dox ester (1) and amide (2) conjugates. Cell uptake studies showed that the conjugates were 6-10 times selective for breast cancerous cells (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-435) over noncancerous cells (HUVECs and MCF-10A). Conjugate 1 displayed similar toxicity as free Dox toward the breast cancerous cells and was about 40 times less toxic toward the noncancerous cells and 4-fold more toxic toward the Dox resistant MDA-MB-435-MDR cells than the free Dox. These data suggest that conjugate 1 can be used as a potential prodrug for improving the therapeutic index of Dox and potentially many other cytotoxic drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".