Does domestication mimic speciation? 1. A population-genetic analysis of<i>Hordeum spontaneum</i>and<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>based on AFLP and evolutionary considerations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To answer the question whether Hordeum spontaneum K. Koch. and Hordeum vulgare L. are conspecific taxonomic entities or not”, we carried out an investigation with amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism (AFLP™) using H. vulgare cultivars, H. spontaneum from the Fertile Crescent, and material from China, primarily Xizang (Tibet), containing landraces and accessions identified morphologically as Hordeum agriocrithon Åberg. and H. spontaneum. Population genetic analyses and discriminant analyses were based on three groupings, H. vulgare, H. spontaneum, and H. agriocrithon, determined from morphology. To independently find groups, cluster analyses were carried out followed by population-genetic analyses and discriminant analyses of the clusters. The results of population-genetic analyses of morphologically based groups were not very different from those of comparable analyses of groups inferred from clustering. Based on 795 AFLP bands scored on 506 individuals, genetic diversity was 30% higher within H. spontaneum than within H. agriocrithon or H. vulgare. The variation among the three entities was 27.3% (FCT= 0.27) and among populations within the three was 40.4% (FSC= 0.56) leaving 32.3% (FST= 0.68) within populations/accessions. Three entities were clearly defined by clustering and supported by discriminant analyses, and then nomenclaturally formulated, two as species and one as an interspecific hybrid. The first, H. spontaneum, comprises populations in the Near East, the second, H. vulgare, comprises the cultivars, and the third, H. ×agriocrithon, comprises all barley landraces and hybrids from China as well as hybrids from the Near East. We discuss evolutionary perspectives of speciation and conclude that barley cultivars form a species distinct from the wild progenitor, H. spontaneum. This analysis may highlight the dilemma regarding other cultivated plants and domesticated animals, a still unresolved evolutionary–taxonomic problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".