Influence of Short-Chain Aliphatic Acids on the Phenanthrene Desorption and Mobilization from Contaminated Soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was performed to investigate the influence of short-chain aliphatic acids (SCAAs) on the desorption of phenanthrene from artificially contaminated soils with this polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. Five SCAAs examined, including acetic acid, oxalic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid and citric acid, were related to the increase of phenanthrene desorption from two kinds of soil. Citric acid and oxalic acid enhanced phenanthrene desorption to a more significant extent than other organic acids. The effects of pH, SCAA concentration, and ionic strength were further evaluated. The phenanthrene desorption was enhanced as the pH increased. An increase in desorbed phenanthrene from pH 3 to pH 8 was observed, but that was followed by a slight decrease above pH 8 for most SCAAs. The phenanthrene desorption performance showed increments with increasing organic acid concentrations. However, the increase of phenanthrene desorption became less remarkable when SCAA concentrations were above 100 mmol/L. Moreover the results suggested that high ionic strength hindered the desorption of phenanthrene in the presence of SCAAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".