MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092941691 · doi:10.1139/g01-108

Construction of a YAC library from barley cultivar Franka and identification of YAC-derived markers linked to the<i>Rh</i>2 gene conferring resistance to scald (<i>Rhynchosporium secalis</i>)

2001· article· en· W2092941691 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dagmar Schmidt, Marion S. Röder, Harald Dargatz, Norbert Christian Wolf, Günther Schweizer, A. Tekauz, Martin W. Ganal

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsBiologyHordeum vulgareGeneticsGene mappingGeneYeast artificial chromosomeGenomePositional cloningChromosomeBacterial artificial chromosomeGenetic markerPlant disease resistanceGenomic libraryBotanyLocus (genetics)Poaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rh2 resistance gene of barley (Hordeum vulgare) confers resistance against the scald pathogen (Rhynchosporium secalis). A high-resolution genetic map of the Rh2 region on chromosome I (7H) was established by the use of molecular markers. Tightly linked markers from this region were used to screen existing and a newly constructed yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) library of barley cv. Franka composed of 45,000 clones representing approximately two genome equivalents. Corresponding YAC clones were identified for most markers, indicating that the combined YAC library has good representation of the barley genome. The contiguous sets of YAC clones with the most tightly linked molecular markers represent entry points for map-based cloning of this resistance gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207