Calculated microdosimetric characteristics of 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy seeds at different depths in water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both (125)I and (103)Pd sources have been widely used in the permanent prostate implant. An important consideration for the choice of brachytherapy sources is the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for the source/seed used in the implantation. As RBE is closely related to the microdosimetric parameter, it is desirable to calculate the dose mean lineal energies for both (125)I and (103)Pd at various radial distances to the seed surface. Monte Carlo simulation was performed for photons emitted from (125)I and (103)Pd. Energy depositions from photons and all their secondary electrons were tracked. Dose distributions of lineal energy, d(y), were calculated for spheres of 1 microm in diameter and at various radial distances to the seed surface. From the dose distribution of lineal energy, the dose mean lineal energy, y(D), was derived. The results showed that the radiation qualities are constant in the distance range from 0.5 to 5 cm. In this distance range, the quality factor, relative to gamma rays from (60)Co, is 2.2 for (125)I and 2.5 for (103)Pd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".