A comparative cytological analysis of fungal endophytes in the sporophyte rhizomes and vascularized gametophytes of <i>Tmesipteris</i> and <i>Psilotum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the results of a light and electron microscopic study of the fungal endophytes and vascular anatomy in the rhizomes and gametophytes of Tmesipteris and Psilotum. The parenchymatous cortical cells of the rhizomes and subterranean gametophytes of Tmesipteris and Psilotum contain intracellular aseptate glomeromycotean fungi resembling the “Paris-type” of arbuscular mycorrhizas found in seed plants. The fungi differentiate into multinucleate vesicles and hyphal coils, both containing bacteria-like structures and accumulating lipid masses and crystals as they age. After several cycles of infection in the same cell, degenerate hyphae form amorphous masses encased by host wall material. Nearly identical host–fungus cytology between the autotrophic sporophytes and the heterotrophic gametophytes suggests that these psilophyte associations are exploitative of the fungus in both generations. Following the description of tracheids nearly 60 years ago in the gametophytes of Psilotum, vascular elements are described for the first time in the haploid generation of Tmesipteris. Close similarities between the water- and food-conducting elements in both generations, viz. vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates and sieve cells with refractive spherules and lacking callose at all stages in their develoment, add support to the homologous theory of the alternations of generations. Mitochondrial aggregations, cross-linked by small electron-opaque rods, are common in the stelar cells of both generations and appear to be a unique feature of the psilophyte clade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".