MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093065920 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0227

Slow Darkening in Pinto Bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.) Seed Coats Is Controlled by a Single Major Gene

2008· article· en· W2093065920 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Donna C. Junk‐Knievel, Albert Vandenberg, Kirstin E. Bett

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPinto beanPhaseolusBiologyGermplasmTraitHorticultureGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Postharvest seed coat darkening is a significant problem in pinto beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.), resulting in product that is undesirable to consumers and that is discounted in the marketplace. There is a range in the rate and extent of darkening among pinto germplasm and recently, slow‐darkening (SD) lines have been identified. Line 1533‐15, an SD line from the University of Saskatchewan, was crossed to CDC Pintium, a regular darkening pinto, and seed of F 1 and F 2 individuals and F 5:6 recombinant inbred lines were assessed for their darkening phenotype. Segregation data indicated that there is a single, recessive gene that controls the SD phenotype. All F 2 individuals from a cross between 1533‐15 and Pinto Saltillo, another SD line, were slow‐darkening suggesting that the phenotype is controlled by the same gene in both lines. The simple genetics of this trait should facilitate the introduction of this trait into breeding programs, thereby increasing the quality of pinto beans being developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207