Internationalizing the struggle against neoliberal social policy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English The dominant economic philosophy, heavily influenced by neoliberalism, is antagonistic to state intervention. Drawing on the case of Canada, we argue that women's groups could resort to international advocacy to combat neoliberal social policy. Such advocacy has a number of potentials as discussed, including fostering a rights-based discourse. French Fortement influencée par le néolibéralisme, la philosophie économique dominante est antagoniste à l'intervention étatique. Nous référant à l'expérience canadienne, nous soutenons que les groupes de femmes pourraient faire appel à des organismes internationaux d'appui et de défense des droits pour combattre les politiques néolibérales sociales. De tels défenseurs peuvent plaider en faveur des femmes des façons suivantes: cette inclus promouvoir un discours fondé sur les droits. Spanish La filosofía económica dominante que ha sido influida profundamente por el neo-liberalismo, es contraria a la intervención del estado. Basado en el caso de Canadá, argüimos que los grupos representando a las mujeres recuren a la abogacía internacional para combatir las políticas neo-liberales sociales. Tal forma de abogacía tiene las siguientes características: presiona a los gobiernos a que abandonen políticas contra las mujeres; fomenta un discurso basado en los derechos; y actúa como catalizador para los esfuerzos de implementación a nivel domestico y nacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".