MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093119470 · doi:10.2118/172003-ms

A New Approach for Optimization and Uncertainty Assessment of Surfactant-Polymer Flooding

2014· article· en· W2093119470 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringPetrophysicsFaciesEnhanced oil recoveryPermeability (electromagnetism)Oil in placeGeologyReservoir simulationFlooding (psychology)Water floodingPorosityEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringStructural basinGeomorphologyPetroleumChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Surfactant-Polymer (SP) flooding has become an attractive Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) method. Defining chemical concentrations, chemical types and an injection schedule, according to geological features of a reservoir and well pattern, is key to making decisions for reservoir management. In this paper, we introduce an innovative approach for EOR optimization under geological uncertainty by integrating a reservoir geological property modelling and a robust optimizer. Multiple reservoir realizations are generated automatically by geology-driven modeling software and sent directly to an optimizer to analyze the effect of single or multi-parameters on objective functions such as cumulative oil production and net present value (NPV). Clay minerals play an important role in chemical flooding, but it is rarely included in the reservoir simulation. In this study, the distribution and proportion of clay are investigated in terms of facies and its relationship with porosity and permeability for a sandstone reservoir. Different facies and petrophysical properties are geostatiscally generated in a geologic manner that significantly improves the quality of history matching and optimization processes. It is found that SP flooding has the highest oil recovery factor in comparison with waterflooding, polymer flooding and surfactant flooding, and it demonstrates good performances even in high clay content reservoirs. The optimal formulation of SP and polymer slugs and injection schedule were proposed. The effect of clay content in cumulative oil and NPV were addressed, in which the more clay content is the lower NPVs obtain. A comprehensive geological uncertainty analysis has been performed for: (1) facies distribution only; (2) facies distribution and proportion. The results indicated that NPV uncertainty is less than 2.25% for (1) and about 4.18% to 5.68% for (2). The proposed optimization approach could be effectively applied to tertiary EOR techniques in various reservoir conditions under geological uncertainty. By integrating geological software, reservoir simulator and robust optimizer, it serves as a powerful tool for design and optimization of these processes. SP flooding is definitely a complicated process, therefore, an innovative modeling and optimization approach for SP flooding described in this paper is needed to improve the prediction of process performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it