MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093146214 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v5n4p50

Public Order and Security Institutions Competences Which Determine the Working Action Framework of Their Officials. The Case of Hellenic Coast Guard Personnel

2012· article· en· W2093146214 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tryfon Korontzis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBorder Security and International Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionGuard (computer science)Administration (probate law)Public administrationLawPolitical scienceOrder (exchange)State (computer science)Internal securityInstitutionCriticismDemocracyBusinessPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The institutions that have been established by the State and supported democracy, guaranteeing the safeguard of citizens individual and social rights. Each institution is governed by structures, which have specific functions concerning its internal structure, organization and administration but also the specific mission which is requested to carry out, in accordance with the existing legal framework as provided in the Constitution, laws, regulations acts, in the legal opinions issued by the Judicial and Prosecutorial Authorities as also in the legal opinions issued by the Council of the State.In order to be achieved the above there are many institutions which performed – carrying out mainly police duties such as Hellenic Police (HP), Hellenic Coast Guard (HCG), Municipality Police, etc. These institutions and more specifically HP and HCG and in particular, their mission, role, act and their internal administration mechanisms, have been and are often subjected of social criticism but also sometimes subject of social approval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicBorder Security and International RelationsFrench-language works237,207