A differential-algebraic approach for robust control design and disturbance compensation of finite-dimensional models of heat transfer processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control design for heat transfer processes usually has to deal with significant uncertainty in parameters of finite-dimensional system models. These finite-dimensional models are used as an approximation for the underlying infinite-dimensional representation of the system dynamics governed by partial differential equations. To obtain control laws that can be evaluated in real time, the infinite-dimensional representation usually has to be replaced by a finite-dimensional one. However, the resulting approximation errors as well as the parameters characterizing heat transfer and heat conduction properties are typically not directly measurable in experiments. Therefore, control strategies have to be derived that are able to cope with the before-mentioned sources of uncertainty. In this paper, a robust combination of feedforward and feedback control laws is derived that guarantees asymptotic stability and accurate trajectory tracking. The robustness of the control structure is obtained by an offline control synthesis by means of linear matrix inequalities for a linear system model with polytopic uncertainty. Moreover, an efficient approach for solving high-dimensional and high-index differential algebraic equations, implemented in DAETS, is employed to numerically compute dynamic feedforward control sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it