MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093176485 · doi:10.1071/ch05175

Synthesis and Characterization of SAMs and Tethered Bilayer Membranes from Unsymmetrically Substituted 1,2-Dithianes

2005· article· en· W2093176485 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Burns, Leslie D. Field, Brian J. Petteys, Damon D. Ridley

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
FundersU.S. Bureau of Land Management
KeywordsValinomycinMembraneChemistryMonolayerBilayerBiosensorModel lipid bilayerDielectric spectroscopyLipid bilayerEthylene glycolSelf-assembled monolayerChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryLipid bilayer phase behaviorElectrodeElectrochemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis of a series of new membrane-forming compounds, based on previously established components used in an ion-channel switch (ICS) biosensor (Nature1997, 387, 580) is described. All new compounds are derived from 4,5-dihydroxy-1,2-dithiane, and contain a hydrophilic reservoir section (based on ethylene glycol units) and a lypophilic section (based on the natural lipid phytanol). Ellipsometry and contact angle measurements indicate that self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) formed from the new materials possess thicknesses and membrane packing comparable to previously reported biosensor components. Tethered bilayer lipid membranes (t-BLMs) incorporating the novel materials were studied using impedance spectroscopy with the ion-carrier valinomycin. The electrical behavior and calculated membrane thickness of the t-BLMs are comparable to those derived from the standard ICS components and this demonstrates that the novel membrane-forming compounds form stable membranes that are sufficiently fluid to transport potassium ions in the presence of valinomycin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207