A High-Resolution Coastal Circulation Model for Lunenburg Bay, Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high-resolution coastal circulation model is used to study the three-dimensional barotropic circulation in Lunenburg Bay and adjacent Upper and Lower South Coves, Nova Scotia. The model is driven by tidal forcing and shelf waves specified at the model open boundaries and wind stress applied at the sea surface. The tidal forcing at the model open boundaries is inferred from the tidal sea level prediction at Lunenburg Harbour. The remotely generated sub-inertial shelf waves that propagate into the model domain through the model open boundaries are calculated by a coarse-resolution storm surge model for the eastern Canadian seaboard. The high-resolution coastal circulation model is used to investigate the nonlinear tidal dynamics in the study region. The model results demonstrate that tidal circulation in the bay and the two coves is highly nonlinear with strong tidal asymmetry between flooding and ebbing, with an intense narrow jet flowing outward from Upper South Cove to Lunenburg Bay during the ebb. The coastal circulation model is also used to simulate the barotropic circulation in Lunenburg Bay during Hurricane Gustav in the second week of September, 2002. The model results demonstrate strong interactions between the local wind stress, tidal forcing, and remotely generated shelf waves during this period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".