MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093284155 · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201200294

Synthetic Studies Towards the Core Tricyclic Ring System of Pradimicin A

2012· article· en· W2093284155 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Zilke, Dennis G. Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCycloisomerizationChemistryEnyneCycloadditionStereochemistryBicyclic moleculeMetathesisEnyne metathesisRing (chemistry)Ring-closing metathesisCombinatorial chemistryDieneTotal synthesisOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pradimicins are structurally intriguing natural products that possess potent biological activity as antifungal and antiviral agents through a unique mode of action as carbohydrate binding agents. A preliminary synthetic approach towards pradimicin A has focused on a model study of the core tricyclic ring system. The route features an alkoxyallylboration/cycloisomerization/Diels–Alder cycloaddition sequence as the key steps. The alkoxyallylboration was critical for differentiating the hydroxy groups in the central cyclohexadienediol unit of pradimycins, which will ensure a regiocontrolled glycosylation. For the cycloisomerization reaction, various substrates and conditions were tested for a ring‐closing enyne metathesis reaction. With enyne substrate 23, dimerization‐prone bicyclic diene 24 was isolated as the major product under the conditions of both ruthenium‐catalyzed metathesis and palladium‐catalyzed cycloisomerization. In the end, the optimal route found for the synthesis of the model functionalized tricyclic ring system 31 features a one‐pot sequential palladium‐catalyzed cycloisomerization, Diels–Alder reaction, and oxidative aromatization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207