Reduction of hypoxia‐inducible heme oxygenase‐1 in the myocardium after left ventricular mechanical support
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) may improve cardiac function. The pathogenesis of this phenomenon, called 'reverse remodelling', is not completely elucidated. To examine the hypothesis that LVAD support eliminates tissue stress by reducing local hypoxia, the distribution of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), a stress protein inducible by hypoxia, was examined in vivo and in vitro. The immunoreactivity for HO-1 was semi-quantitatively analysed in left ventricular tissue of 23 patients (14 dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), six ischaemic heart disease (IHD), three myocarditis/congenital heart disease) with end-stage heart failure before and after LVAD support, while two unused donor hearts served as controls. Control hearts stained almost negative for HO-1, while failing hearts showed immunoreactivity mainly in cardiomyocytes, but also in endothelial cells, some smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Hearts with IHD showed significantly higher HO-1 immunoreactivity than hearts with DCM or myocarditis/congenital heart disease. After LVAD support, the HO-1 content decreased significantly in the DCM and IHD group and was significantly higher in the subendocardium than in the subepicardium. In vitro, under hypoxic conditions, neonatal rat cardiomyocytes showed an increase of HO-1 protein content up to sixfold above the normal level, which returned to normal values after normoxic cultivation. Mechanical support reduces the HO-1 content of the failing heart and HO-1 is inducible in vitro under hypoxia and is reversible under normoxia. This supports the concept that restoration of cardiac normoxia by mechanical unloading, particularly in the subendocardium, may be in part responsible for the phenomenon of 'reverse remodelling'.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".