MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093297962 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2007-008-7

Endomorphism Algebras of Kronecker Modules Regulated by Quadratic Function Fields

2007· article· en· W2093297962 on OpenAlexafffund
Frank Okoh, Frank Zorzitto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsEndomorphismKronecker deltaRational functionAlgebraically closed fieldCombinatoricsSimple (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsField (mathematics)Function (biology)Pure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purely simple Kronecker modules ℳ, built from an algebraically closed field K, arise from a triplet (m, h, α) where m is a positive integer, h: K ∪ ﹛∞﹜ → ﹛∞, 0, 1, 2, 3, … ﹜ is a height function, and α is a K-linear functional on the space K(X) of rational functions in one variable X. Every pair (h, α) comes with a polynomial f in K(X)[Y] called the regulator. When the module ℳ admits nontrivial endomorphisms, f must be linear or quadratic in Y. In that case ℳ is purely simple if and only if f is an irreducible quadratic. Then the K-algebra End ℳ embeds in the quadratic function field K(X)[Y]/(f). For some height functions h of infinite support I, the search for a functional α for which (h, α) has regulator 0 comes down to having functions η : I → K such that no planar curve intersects the graph of η on a cofinite subset. If K has characterictic not 2, and the triplet (m, h, α) gives a purely-simple Kronecker module ℳ having non-trivial endomorphisms, then h attains the value ∞ at least once on K ∪ ﹛∞﹜ and h is finite-valued at least twice on K ∪ ﹛∞﹜. Conversely all these h form part of such triplets. The proof of this result hinges on the fact that a rational function r is a perfect square in K(X) if and only if r is a perfect square in the completions of K(X) with respect to all of its valuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207