MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093297962 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2007-008-7

Endomorphism Algebras of Kronecker Modules Regulated by Quadratic Function Fields

2007· article· en· W2093297962 on OpenAlexafffund
Frank Okoh, Frank Zorzitto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsEndomorphismKronecker deltaRational functionAlgebraically closed fieldCombinatoricsSimple (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsField (mathematics)Function (biology)Pure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purely simple Kronecker modules ℳ, built from an algebraically closed field K , arise from a triplet ( m , h , α) where m is a positive integer, h : K ∪ ﹛∞﹜ → ﹛∞, 0, 1, 2, 3, … ﹜ is a height function, and α is a K -linear functional on the space K ( X ) of rational functions in one variable X . Every pair ( h , α) comes with a polynomial f in K ( X )[ Y ] called the regulator. When the module ℳ admits nontrivial endomorphisms, f must be linear or quadratic in Y . In that case ℳ is purely simple if and only if f is an irreducible quadratic. Then the K -algebra End ℳ embeds in the quadratic function field K ( X )[ Y ]/( f ). For some height functions h of infinite support I , the search for a functional α for which ( h , α) has regulator 0 comes down to having functions η : I → K such that no planar curve intersects the graph of η on a cofinite subset. If K has characterictic not 2, and the triplet ( m , h , α) gives a purely-simple Kronecker module ℳ having non-trivial endomorphisms, then h attains the value ∞ at least once on K ∪ ﹛∞﹜ and h is finite-valued at least twice on K ∪ ﹛∞﹜. Conversely all these h form part of such triplets. The proof of this result hinges on the fact that a rational function r is a perfect square in K ( X ) if and only if r is a perfect square in the completions of K ( X ) with respect to all of its valuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207