MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093431503 · doi:10.1021/ma026012h

Solid-State NMR Investigation of Morphology in Poly(<i>N</i>-vinylcarbazole) Complexes with Poly(ethylene glycol) Monomethyl Ether 3,5-Dinitrobenzoate

2003· article· en· W2093431503 on OpenAlexaff
G. Cojocariu, Almeria Natansohn

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthylene glycolLamellar structurePolymer chemistryPEG ratioEtherMaterials scienceOligomerProton NMRCopolymerSide chainPolyelectrolyteCrystallographySpin diffusionChemistryChemical engineeringPolymerDiffusionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interactions and morphology were investigated by solid-state NMR in macromolecular charge transfer (CT) complexes formed between poly( N -vinylcarbazole) (PVK) and a surfactant consisting of a monomethyl ether poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) oligomer functionalized at one end with a 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl (DNB) group. 13 C CP MAS NMR spectra indicated that in the PVK/PEG−DNB complexes containing 33.1 and 50.0 mol % PEG−DNB, the PEG chains undergo microphase separation. The balance between the PVK/DNB CT interactions and the repulsion between the PVK backbone and the PEG side chains produces comblike structures similar to those observed in polyelectrolyte/surfactant complexes. The size of the domains in these microphase-separated comblike CT complexes was evaluated on the basis of proton spin−lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame [ T 1 ρ (H)] and spin diffusion data. Assuming a lamellar morphology, the PEG microdomain is about 3 nm thick. The size of the PVK/DNB microdomains was estimated at about 5 nm, suggesting that the PVK chains must be oriented perpendicular to the direction of the domain thickness, in the layer plane, the layer thickness being given by about two to three PVK chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207