Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of the photodegradation of naphthenic acids mixtures irradiated with titanium dioxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was used to study the photodegradation of an oil sands naphthenic acid (NA) mixture, a commercial Fluka NA mixture and a candidate NA, 4-Methyl-cyclohexaneaceticic acid (4-MCHAA) irradiated with TiO(2) (P25) suspension under both fluorescent and natural sunlight. Under natural sunlight irradiation over the TiO(2) suspension, approximately 75% of compounds in the NA mixtures and 100% of 4-MCHAA were degraded in 8 h. No degradation was observed under dark conditions, regardless of the presence or absence of TiO(2). The structural formula of the NAs is given by C(n)H(2n + z)O(2), where n represents the carbon number and z specifies a homologous family with 0-6 rings (z = 0 to -12). The degree of degradation was noted to vary among the NA mixtures and the candidate NA compound with more efficient degradation achieved for molecules with -z values from 0 to 6. The difference in the efficacy of the photocatalysis was likely due to the structure and size of the compounds. In the case of -z = 6 to 12, steric constraints are a key factor what hinders photocatalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".