Paediatric and adult multiple sclerosis: age-related differences and time course of the neuroimmunological response in cerebrospinal fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate common pathophysiology in paediatric and adult multiple sclerosis (MS) by comparison of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data. We compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data from eight patient groups with onset of MS at 7 to 29 years (n = 184). A new statistics program allows sensitive detection, quantifies the mean amount of intrathecal Ig synthesis in groups based on the 96% reference range of 4100 non-inflammatory controls, corrects for age-related increase of blood-derived albumin and immunoglobulins in CSF, and presents graphical data interpretation in Reibergrams. Already at onset of MS before puberty (< or =10 years) the frequency of intrathecal IgG synthesis (oligoclonal IgG) was 100% like in adults with 98%, but the amount of intrathecal IgG increases twofold during puberty. Intrathecal IgM synthesis is most frequent before and during puberty (in 57-67% of patients) compared with 41% in adults. The amount of intrathecal IgM synthesis before puberty is only 30% of that in adults. IgG and IgM Index are biased evaluations not suitable for characterizing age-related dynamics. A twofold age-related increase of the albumin quotient, Q(Alb), as a measure of the blood-CSF barrier function, represents normal physiological growth. Cell counts in CSF are low. The pre-puberty gender ratio is about 1:1. Intrathecal antibodies against measles, rubella and/or varicella zoster virus are detected in 73% of patients before puberty compared with 89% of adults. Individual paediatric patients (n = 17), with sequential punctures over 2-5 years, show constant quantities of intrathecal IgM and specific antibodies. In conclusion, paediatric MS already at first clinical manifestation shows the complete, neuroimmunological data pattern in CSF, i.e. inflammatory signs are not gradually evolving. Paediatric and adult MS differ quantitatively but not qualitatively in neuroimmunological patterns which does not allow for discrimination between 'early' and 'late' onset MS. CSF analysis may help to discriminate between acute and mono-symptomatic chronic inflammatory disease already at earliest clinical manifestation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".