The End of Early Music: A Period Performer’s History of Music for the Twenty-First Century (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: The End of Early Music: A Period Performer’s History of Music for the Twenty-First Century Bettina Ryan (bio) Bruce Haynes. The End of Early Music: A Period Performer’s History of Music for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. xx, 284. US$35.00 Scholarly discussions of performance practice have permeated musicological literature since the 1980s, concentrating in particular on issues of authenticity in historical music-making. In The End of Early Music, Haynes continues in a similar vein, offering provocative opinions about ‘matters of style, performance, [and] the communication of emotion’ in the current Historically Inspired (rather than Informed) Performance movement (hip). One main feature distinguishing this book from previous studies, however, is Haynes’s adoption of the term Rhetorical music to designate all aspects of ‘musicking’ prior to the Romantic Revolution. Feeling that Rhetorical music better ‘expresses the essence of the musical spirit’ in the Baroque era than the more common rubric Early music, Haynes’s consideration of hip through this lens informs much of his study. The End of Early Music is organized into five sections, presenting Haynes’s ideas to the accompaniment of no fewer than seventy-two online musical examples. Haynes begins by defining current performance styles, which he divides into three main categories: Modern, Romantic, and Period. Not only does he highlight their musical characteristics, but also examines their surrounding ideologies. His aversion to Modern style is succinctly summed up in the title of the third chapter, ‘Mainstream Style “Chops, [End Page 241] but No Soul.”’ Haynes likens Modern ensemble performers to automatons: musicians so concerned with the literal interpretation of the score that the only music they are capable of producing is characterized by a lack of beat hierarchy, unyielding tempos, unstressed dissonances, ‘rigidly equal’ sixteenth notes, and emotional detachment. Romantic style is given a better rap, although Haynes does not shy away from stressing its overly exaggerated portamento, legato, tempo, and rubato, as well as the melody-based phrasing, unrelenting heaviness, and general lack of precision. Nevertheless, Haynes does concede that both Modern and Romantic styles are useful for certain repertories – Rhetorical music is not one of them, of course. One might expect Haynes, a Period performer, to offer a glowing review of the current hip movement or Period style, yet this is not the case. If anything, The End of Early Music is a manifesto of sorts, urging Period performers to cast off notions of Werktreue and text-fetishism inherited from the legacy of Romantic music, and promoting a more fluid performance style than that of ‘Strait’ (as in ‘strait jacket’) modernists. In an attempt to revitalize hip, Haynes devotes the majority of his study to contrasting various aspects of Rhetorical music-making with that of the Romantic and Modern periods. In an admirable chapter ‘Changing Meanings, Permanent Symbols,’ he outlines the disparity between the descriptive notation of Rhetorical music and prescriptive notation of later periods. The role of Period instruments in current performance practice and the importance of Period composition are also considered. Finally, Haynes examines the implications of a rhetorically based approach to musical performance in which melodic figures and gestures dominate, declamation is key to musical execution, listeners become active participants, and performers seek ‘to win over the hearts of their listeners,’ just like a good orator would. Ultimately, Haynes’s concern is not that Period performers reproduce the music of Bach or Vivaldi ‘the way it really was,’ but that they try to achieve an authentic, rhetorically based performance style using all the available tools and evidence, for, in the end, that style will still be ‘our own.’ The ideas proposed in The End of Early Music provide modern Period performers with a historically sound framework upon which to build their interpretations of Rhetorical music. Haynes’s book not only provides ‘personal reflections’ on the hip movement, as stated in the humble preface, but also actively engages with source writings on Baroque musical performance by Matheson, Quantz, North, and Burney, among others. His notions of Period style suggest a musical landscape similar to that of the Baroque era, in which performers were also composers, and a piece of music was different each...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".