A framework for representing navigational patterns as full temporal objects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Navigational patterns have applications in several areas including: web personalization, recommendation, user-profiling and clustering, etc. Most existing works on navigational pattern-discovery give little consideration to the effects of time (or temporal trends) on navigational patterns. Some recent works have proposed frameworks for partial temporal representation of navigational patterns. This paper proposes a framework that models navigational patterns as full temporal objects that may be represented as time series. Such a representation allows a rich array of analysis techniques to be applied to the data. The proposed framework also enhances the understanding and interpretation of discovered patterns, and provides a rich environment for integrating the analysis of navigational patterns with data from the underlying organizational environments and other external factors. Such integrated analysis is very helpful in understanding navigational patterns (e.g., E-commerce sites may integrate the trend analysis of navigational patterns with other market data and economic indicators). To achieve full temporal representation, this paper proposes a navigational pattern-discovery technique that is not based on pre-defined thresholds. This is a shift from existing techniques that are driven by pre-defined thresholds that can only support partial temporal representation of navigational patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".