The effects of very slow rates of stimulus presentation on event-related potential estimates of hearing threshold
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study evaluated the use of slow rates of stimulus presentation on the accuracy of the N1-P2 cortical response in estimating hearing threshold. Long interstimulus intervals (ISI) allow the non-specific component of the N1 response to emerge, believed to reflect widespread cortical arousal that facilitates sensory and motor responses. We examined whether the non-specific N1 would be elicited at intensity levels near threshold. Event-related potentials were recorded to 0.5-, 1.0, and 4.0-kHz tone bursts with a long ISI (8-12 s) while the eleven subjects read a book. The stimulus level varied from -5 to 45 dB nHL. The 1.0-kHz tone burst was also presented with a shorter ISI (1.5-2.5 s), akin to that typically used in the audiological setting. The amplitude of N1-P2 was significantly enhanced in the long compared to short ISI condition, but, importantly, only for the stimuli with a level > or =25 dB nHL. Therefore, the N1-P2 recorded with long ISIs was not more precise in estimating threshold than that recorded with short ISIs, remaining visible to within 10 dB of behavioural threshold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it