MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093519921 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00187

The battle for user-friendly bioinformatics

2013· article· en· W2093519921 on OpenAlexafffund
David Roy Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBattleComputer scienceBioinformaticsFront (military)World Wide WebBiologyEngineeringHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OPINION article Front. Genet., 20 September 2013 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00187

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.081
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.223
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0810.223
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0220.034
Open science0.0140.014
Research integrity0.0080.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.157

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in GeneticsSame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207