Glycine-Containing Flaxseed Orbitides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five new orbitides, cyclolinopeptides 21-25, were identified in flaxseed oil (Linum usitatissimum) extracts. Their HPLC-ESIMS quasimolecular ion peaks at m/z 1097.7 (21), 1115.6 (22), 1131.6 (23), 1018.6 (24), and 1034.6 (25) [M + H](+) corresponded to the molecular formulae C59H89N10O10, C58H87N10O10S, C58H87N10O11S, C53H80N9O9S, and C53H80N9O10S, respectively. Their structures were elucidated by extensive HPLC-ESIMS/MS analyses, and their presence was confirmed by precursor proteins identified in flax genomic DNA sequence data. The amino acid sequences of these orbitides were confirmed as [1-10-NαC]-GILVPPFFLI, [1-10-NαC]-GMLIPPFFVI, [1-10-NαC]-GOLIPPFFVI, [1-9-NαC]-GMLVFPLFI, and [1-9-NαC]-GOLVFPLFI for cyclolinopeptides 21-25, respectively. Previously reported orbitides, [1-9-NαC]-ILVPPFFLI (1), [1-9-NαC]-MLIPPFFVI (2), [1-9-NαC]-OLIPPFFVI (3), [1-8-NαC]-MLVFPLFI (7), and [1-8-NαC]-OLVFPLFI (8), were also present in flaxseed oil. The precursors of orbitides 21, 22, and 24 also produced orbitides 1, 2, and 7 by alternative cyclization. Cyclolinopeptides 3, 8, 23, and 25 contain MetO (O) and are not directly encoded, but are products of post-translational modification of the Met present in 2, 7, 22, and 24, respectively. Sufficient cyclolinopeptide 23 was isolated for characterization via 1D ((1)H and (13)C) and 2D (NOESY and HMBC) NMR spectroscopy. These compounds have been named as cyclolinopeptides U, V, W, X, and Y for 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".