Rheology of wood plastics melt, part 2: Effects of lubricating systems in HDPE/maple composites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rheology of HDPE/maple formulations with two common lubricating systems was studied with the capillary rheometry and the small‐amplitude oscillatory shear experiments. Shear and extensional flow data in the capillary dies revealed different lubricating roles of the additives. Small‐amplitude oscillatory tests using a rotational parallel plate rheometer were performed to further investigate the effects of additives. The ester‐type lubricant was found to both enhance maple filler dispersion and promote excellent external lubrication. The zinc stearate‐ N , N ′‐ethylene bis‐stearamide lubricating system, however, was shown to bear the potential of causing certain adverse effects and its role could not be fully illustrated with the capillary rheometry and the oscillatory tests based on linear viscoelasticity assumptions. Synergistic and simple rule‐of‐mixture effects were identified for different lubricating systems. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:464–473, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it