A Contingency View of the Responses of Voluntary Social Service Organizations in Ontario to Government Cutbacks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Voluntary organizations in Ontario have been thrust into a new environment; government funding on which they have traditionally counted has been reduced to the extent that actions have to be taken in order for some organizations to survive. Using a sample of 85 from a mailed survey to voluntary social service organizations in Toronto, we collected information on how organizational characteristics are influencing the actions taken in the face of these changes. We found that the alternatives considered factored into five dimensions: enhancing the image of the organization; cutting costs; developing strategic plans and accountability; implementing new tactics, such as user fees; and restructuring the governance and management structure. Analysis showed that younger organizations, smaller‐sized agencies, and those with a diverse set of funding sources employ a wider range of options to deal with environmental challenges. Many of these options are directed at protecting the main mission of the organization and building awareness and marketing strength so that the organization reduces its susceptibility to environmental shifts. Résumé Les organismes de bénévolat de l'Ontario sont plongés dans un nouveau contexte, car les subventions gouvernementales sur lesquelles ils comptaient jusqu'à présent sont réduites à un point tel que des mesures doivent être prises afin qu'ils puissent survivre. Un sondage effectué par la poste auprès de 85 organismes de services sociaux bénévoles de Toronto nous a permis de rassembler des données montrant que certaines caractéristiques organisationnelles peuvent influencer les mesures à prendre face à de tels changements, et nous avons envisagé cinq solutions possibles pour remédier à la situation: rehausser l'image de ces organismes; réduire leurs coûts; mettre sur pied certaines stratégies et rendre compte de leurs activités; utiliser de nouvelles tactiques, tels des frais d'utilisation; ainsi qu'en restructurer l'administration et la gestion. Il ressort de cette analyse que les organismes plus récents et de plus petite taille ainsi que ceux bénéficiant de sources de financement plus variées peuvent utiliser un plus vaste ventail d'options pour contrer les difficultés que présente la conjoncture actuelle. La plupart de ces possibilités visent à préserver la mission principale de ces organismes et à renforcer leur vision et leur politique de marketing afin de réduire leur vulnérabilité face à tout changement conjoncturel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it