MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093639780 · doi:10.1080/1028415021000055952

The Effects of Dietary Sulfur Amino Acid Deficiency on Rat Brain Glutathione Concentration and Neural Damage in Global Hemispheric Hypoxia-Ischemia

2002· article· en· W2093639780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNutritional Neuroscience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSulfur Compounds in Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)IschemiaGlutathioneNeuronal damageBrain damageBrain ischemiaOxidative stressChemistryAmino acidNeuroscienceBiochemistryBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineOxygenEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary brain injury in stroke is followed by an excitotoxic cascade, oxidative stress and further neural damage. Glutathione is critical and depleted in oxidative stress. Since cysteine is limiting in glutathione synthesis, this study investigated the effect of dietary sulfur amino acid (SAA) deficiency on neural damage in a rat model of global hemispheric hypoxia-ischemia (GHHI). Animals were fed with SAA deficient ("deficient") or control diet for 3 days, subjected to right common carotid artery ligation and hypoxia, and diet continued for 3 more days. Histologically evaluated neural damage at 7 days post hypoxia-ischemia was greater in "deficient" rats, shown by mean (+/- SEM) global and hippocampal grid scores of 2.5 +/- 0.7 and 34.9 +/- 9.3%, respectively, vs. controls' scores of 0.1 +/- 0.1 and 0.1 +/- 0.1%, respectively. Mean brain (+/- SEM) reduced glutathione was not different between groups at 6h post hypoxia-ischemia, but was decreased in "deficient" animals 3 days later in neocortex (1.46 micromoles/g wet weight +/- 0.05 vs. 1.67 +/- 0.04 in controls) and thalamus (1.60 micromoles/g wet weight +/- 0.05 vs. 1.78 +/- 0.03 in controls). Administration of a cysteine precursor to "deficient" animals did not ameliorate neural damage. These findings suggest that well-nourished but not "deficient" animals tolerate a mild brain insult. The decline in brain glutathione in the "deficient" animals may be one of several contributing mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it