86 EFFECT OF CRYOPROTECTANT EXPOSURE, VITRIFICATION, AND WARMING TIME OF BOVINE CUMULUS OOCYTE COMPLEXES ON IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the importance of cryoprotectants for avoiding ice crystal formation, the high concentrations required for vitrification may be toxic to bovine oocytes. During warming (thawing), the removal of permeating cryoprotectants from cells can lead to osmotic injury, and the most appropriate time interval for warming and cryoprotectant removal from vitrified oocytes is currently uncertain. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of cryoprotectant exposure, vitrification, and warming time of bovine cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) on fertilization and ability to develop as embryos in vitro. Follicles <8 mm in diameter were aspirated from slaughterhouse-derived bovine ovaries. Cumulus oocyte complexes with =3 layers of cumulus cells and a uniform cytoplasm were selected, washed 3 times in Dulbecco’s PBS + 5% newborn calf serum (CS), and randomly divided into 4 groups: 1) control group: no treatment; 2) VS1 group: COC were exposed to vitrification solution 1 [VS1: 7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) and 7.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in TCM-199 + 20% CS] for 5 min; 3) VS1+VS2 group: COC were exposed to VS1 for 5 min followed by vitrification solution 2 (VS2: 15% EG, 15% DMSO, and 0.5 M sucrose in TCM-199 + 20% CS) for 30 s; and 4) vitrified group: COC were exposed to VS1 and VS2, and then vitrified in liquid nitrogen using cryotops. The COC in VS1, VS1+VS2, and vitrified groups were exposed to a warming solution (0.5 M sucrose in TCM-199) for 1 or 5 min. The COC from all groups were in vitro matured (IVM) for 22 h in TCM-199 containing 5% CS, 5 µg mL–1 LH, 0.5 µg mL–1 FSH, and 0.05 µg mL–1 gentamicin at 38.5°C, 5% CO2, and high humidity, incubated with frozen–thawed sperm in Brackett-Oliphant capacitating medium for 18 h, and the presumptive zygotes were cultured in Charles Rosenkrans 1 amino acids (CR1aa) + 5% CS for 9 days. Data were analysed using Proc Glimmix in SAS® 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Cleavage and blastocyst rates in the vitrified group (25 and 2%, respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than in control (75 and 27%), VS1 (68 and 19%), or VS1+VS2 (63 and 22%) groups. Cleavage and blastocyst rates did not differ among non-vitrified groups (P > 0.05). In VS1, VS1+VS2, and vitrified groups, warming time had no effect on cleavage or blastocyst rates (P > 0.05). In conclusion, although cryoprotectant exposure and warming times had no apparent adverse effect, vitrification of bovine COC drastically reduced cleavage and blastocyst rates. Further studies are required to understand how vitrification of bovine COC affects subsequent fertilization and embryo development. This study was supported by the Canadian Animal Genetic Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".