MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093775402 · doi:10.2118/88793-ms

Seismic Integration for Better Modeling of Rock Type Based Reservoir Characterization: A Field Case Example

2004· article· en· W2093775402 on OpenAlexaff
Asnul Bahar, O. Abdel-Aal, Ahmed Ghani, F. P. Silva, Mohan Kelkar

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Conference and Exhibition · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsKerr Wood Leidal Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrophysicsSeismic inversionSeismic to simulationGeologyPorositySeismic attributeReservoir modelingDiagenesisPetrologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum reservoirSeismologyMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the result of a reservoir study where seismic data have been fully utilized to obtain a better rock-type based reservoir characterization model. The study was conducted for a highly faulted carbonate reservoir in the Middle East. The available 3D Seismic data have been used to determine the structure map, fault and fracture network, and porosity distribution. Additionally, two seismic attributes (Energy Half Time and Max. Peak Amplitude) had also been used to assist the determination of stationarity regions used for geostatistical simulation. The reservoir characterization strategy for this study was started with the detailed development of a geological reservoir rock type (RRT) scheme. The RRT scheme was developed based on depositional facies, diagenetic overprints and petrophysical properties, including pore throat size distribution, porosity and permeability. The scheme was then used to constrain the property modeling inside a geological framework that was built based on the seismic interpretation. Prior to the development of 3D porosity model, four porosity maps were generated based on the available interpreted Acoustic Impedance (AI) and well log data. Each map represents the difference of the influence of seismic data, from full seismic influence to no seismic influence. One map has been selected to represent the seismic derived porosity based on the degree of correlation between the AI data and well-log porosity. The integration of seismic-derived porosity into the 3D simulation model was conducted using Bayessian Update principle inside a conditional simulation technique. In this technique, 3D porosity distribution honors the underlying RRT and at the same time its vertical-column average honors seismic-derived porosity. The comparison of the results between the simulation with seismic and simulation without seismic has clearly indicated the value added by seismic data, namely improving the simulation result in the areas of poor well-coverage. This is important in order to honor the diagenesis effect that is difficult to model due to a limited number of wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbu Dhabi International Conference and ExhibitionSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207