Analytical expressions, modeling, and simulations of intensity and frequency fluctuation in a directly modulated semiconductor laser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analytical expressions for the intensity and frequency/phase noise of single mode semiconductor lasers based on quantum-mechanical rate equations are derived. Correlated photons, electrons, and phase Langevin noise sources and their auto and cross-correlation relations are presented along with a novel self-consistent normalized laser model that includes the laser's correlated noise sources. A Symbolically Defined Device (SDD) is constructed using the proposed normalized model and implemented in Agilent's Advanced Design System (ADS) CAD tool. Dynamic laser characteristics are predicted using the SDD implementation for 1300 nm InGaAsP/InP lasers. The results of time domain dynamic simulations of photons, carriers, optical output power, and phase - with and without the effects of the noise - are presented. Simulation results are used to show the effects of random noise on both the phase and optical power output of semiconductor lasers. Simulation results are analyzed to demonstrate the resonance frequency shift dependence on the bias current levels, the relation between the frequency response and the bias current and the dependence of the laser line width broadening on the frequency fluctuations. Comparison between the presented results and other published results (simulations and measurements) show good agreement while achieving simulation time enhancement. The suitability of the proposed models for the study and characterization of the performance of complete systems in both circuit and system simulations is examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".