Conduction anisotropy in porous thin films with chevron microstructures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrical conductivity measurements were performed on structurally anisotropic thin films deposited using the glancing angle deposition apparatus [K. Robbie and M. J. Brett, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 1460 (1997); K. Robbie, J. Sit, and M. J. Brett, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 1115 (1998); K. Robbie and M. J. Brett, US Patent No. 5,866,204 (2 February 1999)]. The films were comprised of bilayers of titanium over silica, engineered as a chevron morphology. Samples were evaporated at various incident vapor deposition angles α, in order to investigate the effects of morphology and voiding on the behavior of conductivity. A rapid decline in the conductivity, accompanied by an increase in conduction anisotropy in the plane of the substrate, was observed with increasing α. A random walk model was developed to model the transport properties of the films, and applied to microstructures predicted by a three-dimensional ballistic thin film simulator. In order to generate reasonable agreement between the modeling and measurement, it was necessary to incorporate the effect of native oxide formation on the exposed surfaces of the titanium layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".