The Effects of Alcohol on Safety Behaviors in Socially Anxious Individuals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental studies have assessed alcohol's effects on social anxiety using self-reports or physiological indices. This study investigated whether alcohol affected observer-rated “safety behaviors” in a sample of socially anxious participants. It was hypothesized that alcohol would lead to increased eye contact and speaking time, and decreased nervous laughter and latency to respond to questions during a social interaction. Eighty-eight high social anxiety participants were randomly assigned to an alcoholic or nonalcoholic beverage condition and then took part in a videotaped social interaction with a trained confederate. Videos were coded for participant safety behaviors as well as confederate behavior. Alcohol had the hypothesized effect of increasing the length of time participants spent speaking during the interaction. Interestingly, confederates interacting with socially anxious participants in the alcohol condition behaved more positively toward them than confederates interacting with control beverage condition participants. Implications for understanding the high comorbidity of social phobia with alcohol use disorders are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it