Effects of Retinoic Acid on Keratinocyte Proliferation and Differentiation in a Psoriatic Skin Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psoriasis is a skin disease characterized by the presence of red plaques on the skin. This pathology is well-known to be a retinoid-sensitive disease. Previous investigations have shown that retinoids can modulate epidermal proliferation with an antiproliferative potential in hyperproliferative skins. The aim of this study was to compare the development of psoriatic substitutes cultured in a retinoic acid supplemented medium with those cultured in medium receiving no supplement, to define the effects of this growth factor on keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. The self-assembly method was used to create substitutes. Characterization of the psoriatic substitutes was performed by histological and immunolabeling analyses. Results showed that psoriatic keratinocyte substitutes cultured with retinoic acid have a thinner epidermis compared with psoriatic keratinocyte substitutes cultured without this supplement. Further, the expression of all tested cell differentiation markers was restored in psoriatic keratinocyte substitutes cultured in presence of retinoic acid. No significant change in epidermal thickness or in the expression of late differentiation markers was observed in healthy keratinocyte substitutes cultured with or without retinoic acid; however, some changes were reported for proliferation and early differentiation markers. Results suggest that retinoic acid can modulate epidermal differentiation and proliferation with an antiproliferative potential in psoriatic substitutes such as observed in psoriatic skin in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it