Comparing Different Designs and Scales of Bubble Columns for Their Effectiveness in Treating Kraft Pulp Mill Effluents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experimental results obtained in three different types of ozone contactors were analyzed to study the effects of the ozone contactor design, configuration, operating conditions, and scale-up on the: (1) ozonation process induced reduction efficiencies of color, AOX, COD, and TOC from biologically treated Kraft pulp mill effluents; (2) the increase in biodegradability of this type of wastewater; and (3) the dynamics of the ozone gas absorption process. The three types of ozone contactors included: (1) an extra-coarse-bubble diffuser ozone contactor; (2) an impinging-jet ozone contactor; and (3) a fine-bubble diffuser ozone contactor. Similar treatment levels were achieved in those ozone contactors although the impinging-jet bubble column was more effective in treating Kraft pulp mill effluents due to its smaller reactor volume and lower off-gas ozone concentrations. Consequently, the operating costs of an ozonation process and ozone off-gas destruction facilities will be greatly reduced when using the impinging-jet bubble column design for treating Kraft pulp mill effluents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".