c‐Rel but not NF‐κB1 is important for T regulatory cell development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regulatory T (Treg) cells are crucial for maintaining peripheral tolerance and controlling T-cell responses. The generation of Treg in the thymus requires TCR triggering and CD28 costimulation. Engagement of these receptors induces a number of signalling pathways, including the activation of NF-kappaB via PKCtheta and the Bcl-10/CARMA1/MALT complex. Previous studies have shown that PKCtheta, Bcl-10 and CARMA1 are important for Treg development. It is unclear, however, whether different members of the NF-kappaB family contribute to Treg development or homeostasis. In this study, we show that Treg numbers are reduced in the absence of c-Rel but not NF-kappaB1 (p50). Furthermore, using mixed bone marrow chimeras from WT and KO animals, we demonstrate that the requirement for PKCtheta, Bcl-10 and c-Rel is T-cell intrinsic, and cannot be rescued by the presence of WT cells. Therefore, c-Rel and NF-kappaB1 have differential roles in Treg development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".