218 THE EFFECT OF OVULATING AGENTS ON MATURE FOLLICLES IN BACTRIAN CAMEL (CAMELUS BACTRIANUS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mature follicle response and CL formation following induction of ovulation using GnRH analogues and LH were investigated in Bactrian camel. Bactriancamels (n = 58) withamature follicle (12-25 mm)received 1) alarelin (Vetaroline®, Aburaihan,Tehran, Iran; 25 µg, i.m. 37/58); 2) buserelin (Receptal®, Intervet, Boxmeer, the Netherlands; 20 µg i.v. 16/58); or 3) LH (Lutropin®-V, Bioniche, Belleville, Ontario, Canada; 25 mg i.v. 5/58; Day 0 of experiment = day of inducing ovulation). Ovarian follicles were considered mature according to previous definition in Bactrian camel (Nikjou D et al. 2008 Theriogenology 69 491-500). Daily ultrasonography was conducted between Days -5 and 15 of the experiment using a real-time ultrasound scanner (Aloka 500, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 5-MHz linear array transrectal transducer. The day after inducing ovulation, the size of the mature follicle increased in 89.7% (52/58; 0.72 mm ± 0.11) or decreased in 10.3% (6/58; 0.75 mm ± 0.13) of observations. All mature follicles ovulated by 48 h after treatment. Corpus luteum was detected on Day 4.9 ± 0.13 at the diameter of 14.0 mm ± 0.31 and reached the maximum diameter of 20.2 mm ± 0.58 on Day 9.0 ± 0.13 after treatment. Vacuolated CL was detected in 14% of observations. Corpuralutea started to regress 1 to 2 days after reaching the maximum diameter. In conclusion, mature follicles, at the diameter of 12 to 25 mm, ovulated and normal CL with the short life span (about 10 days) formed consistently in response to the use of ovulating agent in Bactrian camel. Table 1. Changes in ovarian structures following injection of different GnRH analogues and LH Research was funded by the Deputy of Research, University of Tehran. The authors thank the companies Bioniche (Canada), Aburaihan (Iran) and Intervet (the Netherlands) for kind provision of pharmaceuticals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".