MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094158917 · doi:10.1577/m07-077.1

Large Woody Debris Structures and Their Influence on Atlantic Salmon Spawning in a Stream in Nova Scotia, Canada

2008· article· en· W2094158917 on OpenAlexaffabout
Charles MacInnis, Trevor A. Floyd, Barry R. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRiparian zoneDebrisNova scotiaSalmoLarge woody debrisHabitatSTREAMSChannelizedFisheryEnvironmental scienceCoarse woody debrisHydrology (agriculture)EcologyFish <Actinopterygii>GeologyOceanographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although large woody debris from streamside vegetation has profound influences on channel morphology and habitat for salmonid fishes, it has often been depleted by channelization or deforestation of the riparian zone. We installed artificial structures mimicking naturally fallen trees in a third-order stream in northern Nova Scotia from 1992 to 2004 to determine whether the structures enhanced spawning success of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. In total, 250 digger logs (which mimic fallen tree trunks and stimulate formation of pools) and bank deflectors (which encourage meandering) were constructed in degraded reaches of Brierly Brook beginning at the downstream end. We monitored spawning each year by counting redds during the fall spawning season. Spawning rates (redd counts) in the whole brook increased exponentially for the first 4 years after restoration work began, from 43 in 1992 to 592 in 1996. By 1996, the entire length of Brierly Brook contained redds, and Atlantic salmon were using gravel that accumulated behind digger logs to build redds. Thereafter, redd counts remained high (502–605) but no longer increased, suggesting that restoration near the mouth of the brook removed an impediment to upstream migration. In 2004, reaches with artificial structures had significantly more redds (336) than reaches without the structures (280). In reaches with artificial structures, 48% of the redds were associated with gravel pool tails or the heads of riffles, 44% were near artificial structures, and 7% were near natural large woody debris. In reaches without artificial structures, almost 89% of the redds were associated with pool tails and the remainder were associated with natural large woody debris. Large woody debris, whether natural or artificial, appears to be an important source of spawning habitat for Atlantic salmon. Artificial structures mimicking naturally fallen wood are effective in the restoration of spawning habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Journal of Fisheries ManagementSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207