Mutagenesis Identifies Amino Acid Residues in Extracellular Loops and within the Barrel Lumen That Determine Voltage Gating of Porin from <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> Type b
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porin (341 amino acids; M(r) 37 782) of Haemophilus influenzae type b mediates exchange of solutes between the external environment and the periplasm of this Gram-negative bacterium. Positively charged residues in the extracellular loops have been shown to be involved in the voltage gating of this protein. To further elucidate our observations on the functional properties of this channel, we mutated seven lysines (Lys(48), Lys(161), Lys(165), Lys(170), Lys(248), Lys(250), and Lys(253)) to glutamic acid. The selected residues were previously shown to be accessible to chemical modification, and they map to three locations: loop 4 and loop 6, and within the barrel lumen. The seven mutant proteins were purified, and each was reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers to characterize its channel forming properties. The single substitution mutant porins displayed increased single channel conductances in 1 M KCl ranging between 134 and 178% of the single channel conductance for wild-type Hib porin. Six of the seven mutant porins also displayed altered current-voltage relationships when compared to wild-type Hib porin. Whereas Lys(170)Glu had activity similar to wild-type Hib porin, Lys(48)Glu, Lys(248)Glu, and Lys(253)Glu showed substantial voltage gating at both positive and negative polarities. Lys(161)Glu and Lys(250)Glu gated only at negative potentials, and Lys(165)Glu gated only at positive potentials. Rather than ascribing one specific loop in gating, our analyses of these mutant Hib porins suggest that voltage gating can be attributed to contributions from loops 4 and 6 and a residue within the barrel lumen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".