MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094324557 · doi:10.1021/jf000999+

Analysis of Plant Complex Matrices by Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy:  St. John's Wort Extract

2001· article· en· W2094324557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Rita Bilia, Maria Camilla Bergonzi, G Mazzi, Franco Francesco Vincieri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFlavonolsHeteronuclear moleculeHomonuclear moleculeChromatographySpectroscopyHypericum perforatumNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyPolyphenolHigh-performance liquid chromatographyTwo-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryStereochemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficiency of two-dimensional homonuclear (1)H--(1)H correlated spectroscopy and two-dimensional reverse heteronuclear shift correlation spectroscopy (i.e., heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation) in characterizing and evaluating the relative content of herbal extract constituents is demonstrated. These experiments are able to fully assign the proton and carbon resonances of all three classes of constituents present in dried commercial extract of St. John's wort, that is, flavonols, phloroglucinols, and naphthodianthrones, with particular regard to the very unstable phloroglucinols. In addition, shikimic and chlorogenic acids, sucrose, lipids, polyphenols, and traces of solvents of the extractive process (methanol) were also identified. These experiments can be considered to be a very simple and fast analytical method for determining the quality and stability of the titled commercial extract. They represent a generally applicable technique for a rapid screening and a specific measurement of other commercial phytochemicals or, in selected cases, an alternative to the classical analytical techniques such as high-performance thin-layer chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, capillary gas chromatography, and electrophoresis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicNatural Compound Pharmacology StudiesFrench-language works237,207