MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094368052 · doi:10.1109/tim.2013.2258774

Addressing IEC Flickermeter Deficiencies by Digital Filtration Inside a Sliding Window

2013· article· en· W2094368052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemodulationFlickerElectronic engineeringEngineeringWaveformFrequency modulationModulation (music)Window functionHarmonicSliding window protocolVoltageWindow (computing)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although globally deployed for flicker assessment, the flickermeter presented by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard 61000-4-15 has been proved to suffer from some deficiencies regarding voltage rectangular modulation and interharmonics. The latter results in flickermeter inability to accurately measure flicker for non-incandescent lamps, which are ubiquitous nowadays. The flickermeter inaccuracies tend to arise from its demodulator. So far, few solutions have been provided. Furthermore, the existing solutions deal with only the interharmonic case. This paper introduces a method to address IEC flickermeter deficiencies by developing a digital signal processing block that demodulates the voltage in a real-time manner for voltages that include interharmonics or are affected by rectangular modulation. The suggested demodulator implements discrete Fourier transform inside a sliding window. For rectangular modulation, this approach is used to demodulate the voltage. Meanwhile, for the interharmonics problem, this approach provides the interharmonic frequency. Using the measured frequency, least error squares technique is then employed inside another sliding window to find the interharmonics amplitude. On this basis, a modified flickermeter is devised. Performance of the modified flickermeter is evaluated and its effectiveness is verified using the results obtained from an experimental set-up. The contribution of this paper is not limited to IEC flickermeter modification; the proposed method can be employed for any application requiring interharmonic measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it