Resection of the lesion in patients with hypothalamic hamartomas and catastrophic epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with hypothalamic hamartomas (HH) often have severe refractory epilepsy, incapacitating behavioral abnormalities, and cognitive decline. Attempts to control the seizure disorder by resection of apparently epileptogenic mesial temporal or other cortical structures have failed consistently. OBJECTIVE: To report a series of 13 patients in whom the hamartoma itself was resected. METHODS: All patients underwent preoperative evaluation between ages 2 and 33 years and had subtotal or complete resection of the hamartoma. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 5.5 years (mean: 2.8 y). RESULTS: Preoperatively, all patients had variable combinations of gelastic, complex partial, and generalized seizures. Eight had drop attacks. In addition, all had marked behavior abnormalities and cognitive impairment. Postoperatively, two patients are completely seizure-free and 11 are either seizure-free or have achieved a greater than 90% reduction of drop attacks and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. However, minor gelastic, complex partial, and atypical absence seizures have persisted in 11 patients, although at significantly reduced rates. In addition, there has been a dramatic improvement in behavior and cognition. Three patients had an anterior thalamic and one a capsular infarct, which left only minimal long-term deficits. Exact location of the lesion in relation to the interpeduncular fossa and the walls of the third ventricle correlated with extent of excision, seizure control, and complication rate. CONCLUSION: Resection can alleviate both the seizures and the behavioral and cognitive abnormalities of hypothalamic hamartomas, but complications are frequent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".