MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094477717 · doi:10.1680/grim.2001.5.2.57

Numerical modelling of rock preconditioning by destress blasting

2001· article· en· W2094477717 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bin Tang, Hani S. Mitri

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRock blastingDrilling and blastingGeotechnical engineeringGeologyExcavationMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a three-dimensional numerical modelling technique for the simulation of rock preconditioning by destress blasting in hard rock mining operations at depth. Rock preconditioning is commonly practised in high-stress environments as a means for the alleviation of rockburst events during production drilling and blasting. The numerical model for preconditioning employs two parameters: α, a rock fragmentation factor and β, a stress dissipation factor, in the preconditioned zone. The need for preconditioning to alleviate rockburst occurrence is evaluated from a theory previously established by the authors, which makes use of strain energy parameters to calculate the so-called Burst Potential Index (BPI) in the rockmass surrounding underground excavations. When the BPI approaches or exceeds 100%, the method suggests that rockburst is imminent and rock preconditioning is required. The modelling technique is based on incremental analysis to permit the simulation of successive mining and destressing cycles. This paper focuses on typical face destress blasting practice found in Canadian mines drift development at depth. A drift preconditioning case study is presented using three different destress blasting patterns. Cet article décrit une technique de modélisation numérique tridimensionnelle pour la simulation de pre-conditionnement du roc par les tirs de relaxations (ou decompression) dans les mines profondes de roche dure. La pre-conditionnement du roc est souvent pratiquée dans les endroits de contraintes élevées pour aider à réduire le coups de terrain durant le forage et dynamitage de production. Le modèle numérique de pre-conditionnement emploie deux paramètres: α, un facteur de fragmentation de roche, et β, un facteur de dissipation de contrainte, dans la zone pre-conditionnée. Le besoin de pre-conditionnement pour contrôler le coups de terrain est évalué par une théorie déjà établie par les auteurs, qui utilise les paramètres de l'énergie de déformation pour calculer l'index de potentiel d'un coups (BPI). Quand l'index BPI dépasse 100%, la méthode suggère que le coups de terrain est imminent et que la pre-conditionnement du roc est du. La technique de modélisation est basée sur l'analyse incrémentale afin de permettre la simulation des cycles successifs de minage et décompression. Cet article se concentre sur les tirs de relaxation de face typique, qui se trouve dans les galeries de développement des mines Canadiennes. Un cas d'étude de pre-conditionnement est présenté en utilisant trois patrons différents de tirs de relaxation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground ImprovementSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207