MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094495049 · doi:10.4141/a01-072

Additivity of apparent ileal and fecal phosphorus digestibility values measured in single feed ingredients for growing-finishing pigs

2002· article· en· W2094495049 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Marie Fan, William H. Sauer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCHROMIC OXIDEAnimal scienceFecesCanolaLatin squareMealDry matterPhosphorusIleumChemistryBiologyFood scienceRumenBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two experiments were conducted to determine apparent ileal and fecal P digestibility values in barley, wheat, peas and canola meal and to examine whether the apparent P digestibility values measured in single feed ingredients are additive when used in diet for mulation for growing-finishing pigs. In both experiments, five barrows, with average initial body weights of 40 and 35 kg, were fitted with a simple T-cannula at the distal ileum and fed five diets according to a 5 × 5 Latin sq uare design. In exp. 1, the barrows were fed five diets (diets 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) formulated to contain five graded levels of barley (0, 22.5, 45.0, 67.5 and 90%, respectively) and canola meal (42.7, 36.6, 30.5, 24.4 and 0%, respectively). In exp. 2, the barrows were fed five diets (diets 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) formulated to contain five graded levels of wheat (88.5, 66.4, 44.3, 22.1 and 0%, respectively) and peas (0, 16.8, 33.6, 50.4 and 67.1%, respectively). Chromic oxide (0.4%) was used as a digestibility marker in both experiments. The pigs were fed twice daily, at 0800 and 2000. The dietary allowance was 1800 g d -1 . Each experimental period lasted 8 d. Representative fecal samples were collected during days 5 and 6. Ileal digesta were collected for a total of 24 h, at 2-h intervals, during days 7 and 8. The ileal and fecal P digestibility values in barley, wheat, peas and canola meal were associated with large standard errors, suggesting a large variability within each feed ingredient. There were no differences (P > 0.05) between the directly determined and predicted apparent fecal P digestibility values in diets 2, 3 and 4 of exp. 1. However, there were differences (P < 0.05) between the directly determined and the predicted apparent fecal P digestibility values in diets 3 (46.5 ± 1.0 vs. 38.7 ± 0.6) and 4 (48.2 ± 1.2 vs. 41.6 ± 1.2) in exp. 2, indicating that apparent fecal P digestibility values are not always additive in diet formulation. It is concluded that apparent P digestibility values are variable and not very reliable in diet formulation for swine. Key words: Phosphorus, digestibility, feeds, pigs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207