Role of ICOS versus CD28 in antiviral immunity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The costimulatory protein ICOS is inducibly expressed on activated T cells. Previous results have shown that ICOS(-/-) mice are defective in germinal center formation, antibody (Ab) production and class switch as well as Th1 and Th2 cytokine production in response to protein or parasite antigens. However, ICOS-Ig failed to block antiviral Ab responses. To date the immune response to viruses has not been examined in ICOS(-/-) mice. In this report we compared antiviral Ab responses to LCMV, VSV and influenza virus in ICOS(-/-) versus wild-type mice. Our results show that ICOS is important in the Ab response to all three viruses, with greater effects on primary as compared to secondary responses. Although ICOS(-/-) mice are impaired in some immune responses following influenza infection, the effects were less severe than for CD28(-/-) mice. There was no defect in initial influenza-specific CD8 T cell expansion in ICOS(-/-) mice or in cytotoxic effector function. However, ICOS was important in maintaining CD4 cytokine production and CD8 T cell numbers late in the primary response. Upon secondary infection, ICOS(-/-) mice show wild-type levels of influenza-specific CD8 T cells, whereas CD28(-/-) mice show greatly impaired secondary CD8 T cell expansion. Overall, our results show that ICOS plays a clear role in the primary response to viruses at the level of Ab production, germinal center formation and Th cytokine production, but has diminished effects following secondary viral challenge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".