Wavelet Analysis For Improving INS and INS/DGPS Navigation Accuracy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of the Global Positioning System (DGPS) with an Inertial Navigation System (INS) has been implemented for several years. In an integrated INS/DGPS system, the DGPS provides positions while the INS provides attitudes. In case of DGPS outages (signal blockages), the INS is used for positioning until the DGPS signals are available again. One of the major issues that limit the INS accuracy, as a stand-alone navigation system, is the level of sensor noise. The problem with inertial data is that the required signal is buried into a large window of high frequency noise. If such noise component could be removed, the overall inertial navigation accuracy is expected to improve considerably. The INS sensor outputs contain actual vehicle motion and sensor noise. Therefore, the resulting position errors are proportional to the existing sensor noise and vehicle vibrations. In this paper, wavelet techniques are applied for de-noising the inertial measurements to minimize the undesirable effects of sensor noise and other disturbances. To test the efficiency of inertial data de-noising, two road vehicle INS/DGPS data sets are utilized. Compared to the obtained position errors using the original inertial measurements, the results showed that the positioning performance using de-noised data improves by 34%–63%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it