MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of Time-Activity Patterns in Different Periods in Tianjin, China

2006· article· en· W2094552861 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhipeng Bai, Yu You, Xing Gao, Huanhuan Yu, Liu Yan, Tong Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyChinaStatisticMedicineEnvironmental healthToxicologyGeographyStatisticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P-585 Abstract: Exposure assessment requires two essential data: the duration of time that people are exposed in microenvironments and their activities during the exposure. There are, however, few time-activity patterns data available today in China, which discloses the inherent correlations among activity, location, time and the pattern of exposures. The study collected and analyzed the time-activity patterns data via surveying different group of people. In total, below four surveys were conducted and statistic software SPSS was used to analyze the pattern. (1) Male and female adults’ time-activity pattern survey in 1994. Female adults spent more time in kitchens, bedrooms and offices (72.6% in total) than male adults did (65.8% in total). Time spent outdoors in summer was longer than that in winter. (2) Professional and non-professional time-activity pattern survey for the peracetic acid exposure assessment in 2003. Although there was no difference between general time-activity pattern of nurses and that of common people in the epidemic period of SARS, the time adults spent at home in the special period was little longer than that in normal period. (3) Children and adults’ time-activity pattern survey for the PM[inf]10[r] exposure assessment in 2004. The younger the people are, the longer time they spent indoors. The schoolchildren spent 84.4% of their time indoors on weekdays and 84.3% on weekends on average, higher than 79.4% for the male adults and 83.1% for the female adults. (4) Adolescents, adults and the aged time-activity pattern survey for the VOCs exposure assessment in 2005. The aged spent much more time indoor at home (74.2%) than adults (45.0%) and adolescents (48.0%) did, and the time they stayed outdoors (18.3%) was also longer than adults (5.0%) and adolescents (8.0%) did. Adolescents and adults group spent more time in indoor working/ studying places and in transit. In general, the results showed that the time adults spent in offices has increased from 1994 (22.9% for male and 24.9% for female) to 2004 (31.8% for male and 34.2% for female). The main mode of daily transportation for most adults was the bicycle, and the next was the bus, which kept unaltered. The survey results were compared against the Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey (CHAPS) and the National Human Activity Pattern Survey in US (NHAPS). The comparison results matches with the different life styles among those countries. Key Words: time activity pattern survey, indoor air quality, exposure, Northern China

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207