MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094639588 · doi:10.1093/erae/jbp007

The Softwood Lumber War: Politics, Economics and the Long U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute

2009· article· en· W2094639588 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rakhal Sarker

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsSoftwoodPolitical scienceEconomic historySpanish Civil WarEconomicsAgricultural economicsTrade warInternational tradeLawEngineeringPulp and paper industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article The Softwood Lumber War: Politics, Economics and the Long U.S.–Canada Trade Dispute Get access Daowei ZhangThe Softwood Lumber War: Politics, Economics and the Long U.S.–Canada Trade Dispute Resources for the Future, Washington, 2007.ISBN: 978-1-933115-56-6, 292 pp., Price: $40.95 (paperback). Rakhal Sarker Rakhal Sarker University of Guelph rsarker@uoguelph.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar European Review of Agricultural Economics, Volume 36, Issue 1, March 2009, Pages 128–130, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp007 Published: 20 March 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Review of Agricultural EconomicsSame topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactFrench-language works237,207