Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.004 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
The authors argue that there have been few systematic attempts to determine the effectiveness of community engagement in research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Topic
- Global Health and Surgery
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesBill and Melinda Gates FoundationUniversity of Toronto
- Keywords
- Community engagementDeveloping countryConceptual frameworkKey (lock)Public relationsSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceSocial scienceEconomic growth
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes