Eliminating the Issue of Skin Color in Assessment of the Blanch Response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The high melanin concentration in dark skin prevents the observation of a blanch response to light finger pressure. The objective of this study was to determine the ability of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy (the technique used in pulse oximetry) to monitor a blanch response from in vivo spectra in individuals with light and dark skin, based on changes in blood volume. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental repeated measures design was employed. A stepper motor with an attached spectrophotometer probe was used to deliver controlled pressure to the participants' forearms, mimicking the finger-blanching test. Visible and near-infrared spectra were acquired throughout the blanching cycle. SETTING: The In Vivo Tissue Optics Lab at the Institute for Biodiagnostics, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 10 healthy light-skinned individuals and 10 healthy dark-skinned individuals. RESULTS: Determined by analysis of the spectra, the 2 groups differed in pigmentation in both the visible (P<.01) and near-infrared (P<.01) regions of the absorbance spectrum. There was a significant difference in total hemoglobin at high and low pressure in both the visible (P<.01) and near-infrared (P<.05) regions. CONCLUSIONS: The observation of a significant difference in total hemoglobin at high and low pressure in both light- and dark-skinned groups in this study demonstrates the ability of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor blood volume changes associated with a blanch response. These findings support the potential use of this technology as the basis of a clinically useful blanch response tool that is insensitive to skin color.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".