Growth hormone‐releasing hormone (GHRH) and GHRH receptor (GHRH‐R) isoform expression in ectopic acromegaly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bronchial endocrine neoplasms causing acromegaly due to ectopic production of growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) have been reported. We describe the case of a 39-year-old man with clinical and biochemical acromegaly. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an enlarged pituitary, which was confirmed histologically to harbour somatotroph hyperplasia. Further investigations identified a circumscribed central mass in the right lung which was surgically resected and histologically confirmed to be an endocrine tumour with strong immunopositivity for GHRH, synaptophysin and chromogranin; the lesion also exhibited mild positivity for peptide YY, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH), tyrosine hydroxylase, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and enkephalin. S100 protein was identified in stellate cells surrounding nests of epithelial tumour cells. The MIB-1 antibody labelled about 10% of the tumour cells. We established that the tumour not only produced GHRH but the GHRH-receptor (GHRH-R) as well. GHRH and GHRH-R mRNA were identified and the latter was characterized as two variants, a full-length transcript and a truncated splice variant that has been described in human pituitary somatotroph adenomas. We suggest that GHRH expression by this tumour and the presence of its receptor may be responsible for enhanced growth. The expression of a truncated splice variant that is unable to transduce GHRH signalling may be implicated in the less aggressive behaviour of well-differentiated endocrine tumours that produce GHRH compared with small-cell lung carcinomas that are very responsive to GHRH growth stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".